Find the Extreme values of the Function?| Finding minimum Value with Example

Introduction

Finding extreme values of a function involves identifying the maximum and minimum values the function can achieve. These values can occur at critical points (where the derivative is zero or undefined) or at the boundaries of the domain.

Steps to Find the Minimum Value of a Function

  1. Find the derivative of the function:
    Differentiate the given function f(x)f(x) with respect to xx to obtain f(x)f'(x).
  2. Solve f(x)=0f'(x) = 0:
    Identify the critical points by solving f(x)=0f'(x) = 0 or where f(x)f'(x) is undefined.
  3. Determine the nature of critical points:
    Use the second derivative test or first derivative test:

    • If f(x)>0f”(x) > 0 at a critical point, it’s a local minimum.
    • If f(x)<0f”(x) < 0, it’s a local maximum.
    • If f(x)=0f”(x) = 0, further analysis is needed (e.g., higher derivatives or the first derivative test).
  4. Evaluate endpoints (if the domain is closed):
    Compute f(x)f(x) at the boundary points of the interval.
  5. Compare values:
    Compare the function values at critical points and endpoints to identify the minimum value.

Example: Find the Minimum of f(x)=x36x2+9x+2f(x) = x^3 – 6x^2 + 9x + 2

  1. Find the derivative:
    f(x)=3x212x+9f'(x) = 3x^2 – 12x + 9.
  2. Solve f(x)=0f'(x) = 0:
    3x212x+9=03x^2 – 12x + 9 = 0
    Divide by 3:
    x24x+3=0x^2 – 4x + 3 = 0
    Factorize:
    (x1)(x3)=0(x – 1)(x – 3) = 0
    Critical points: x=1x = 1 and x=3x = 3.
  3. Second derivative test:
    f(x)=6x12f”(x) = 6x – 12.
    At x=1x = 1: f(1)=6(1)12=6f”(1) = 6(1) – 12 = -6 (local maximum).
    At x=3x = 3: f(3)=6(3)12=6f”(3) = 6(3) – 12 = 6 (local minimum).
  4. Find function values:
    f(1)=(1)36(1)2+9(1)+2=6f(1) = (1)^3 – 6(1)^2 + 9(1) + 2 = 6.
    f(3)=(3)36(3)2+9(3)+2=2f(3) = (3)^3 – 6(3)^2 + 9(3) + 2 = 2.
  5. Conclusion:
    The minimum value is 22 at x=3x = 3.

Real-Life Application: Minimizing the Cost of Packaging Material

Problem Statement:
A manufacturer wants to design a cylindrical can that holds a fixed volume of V=1000cm3V = 1000 \, \text{cm}^3. The goal is to minimize the surface area of the can (and hence minimize the cost of the material).

Steps to Solve:

  1. Define Variables:
    • Let rr = radius of the cylinder’s base (in cm).
    • Let hh = height of the cylinder (in cm).
  2. Surface Area Formula:
    The surface area AA includes the area of two circular bases and the lateral surface area:

    A=2πr2+2πrhA = 2\pi r^2 + 2\pi r h

  3. Volume Constraint:
    The volume of the cylinder is fixed:

    V=πr2hSubstituting V=1000V = 1000, we get:

    h=1000πr2h = \frac{1000}{\pi r^2}

  4. Substitute h in A

Replace  h in the surface area formula to express AA in terms of rr:

A=2πr2+2πr1000πr2

Simplify:

A=2πr2+2000rA = 2\pi r^2 + \frac{2000}{r}

  1. Minimize AA : Find the derivative of AA with respect to rr:

    dAdr=4πr2000r2\frac{dA}{dr} = 4\pi r – \frac{2000}{r^2}Set dAdr=0\frac{dA}{dr} = 0:

    4πr=2000r24\pi r = \frac{2000}{r^2}Multiply through by r2r^2:

    4πr3=20004\pi r^3 = 2000
    Solve for rr:

    r3=20004π=500πr^3 = \frac{2000}{4\pi} = \frac{500}{\pi} r=500π3r = \sqrt[3]{\frac{500}{\pi}}

  2. Calculate hh:
    Substitute rr back into the volume constraint:

    h=1000πr2h = \frac{1000}{\pi r^2}

  3. Verify with the Second Derivative Test:
    Compute d2Adr2

    d2Adr2=4π+4000r3\frac{d^2A}{dr^2} = 4\pi + \frac{4000}{r^3}Since d2Adr2>0  A has a minimum.

Final Result:

  • Using numerical methods (or a calculator), approximate the radius rr and height hh:
    r5.42cmr \approx 5.42 \, \text{cm}, h10.84cmh \approx 10.84 \, \text{cm}.
  • Minimum surface area A553.58cm2A \approx 553.58 \, \text{cm}^2.

Interpretation:

The optimal dimensions of the can with the least material cost are:

  • Radius: 5.42cm5.42 \, \text{cm}
  • Height: 10.84cm10.84 \, \text{cm}.

This ensures the volume requirement is met while minimizing the cost of packaging material.

Real-Life Application in Electrical Engineering: Minimizing Power Loss in a Transmission Line

Problem Statement:
In electrical power transmission, power loss PlossP_{\text{loss}} due to resistance in the transmission lines can be minimized by optimizing the transmission voltage. The goal is to find the optimal transmission voltage V that minimizes the power loss while meeting the system’s constraints.

Real-Life Application in Electrical Engineering: Minimizing Power Loss in a Transmission Line

Problem Statement:
In electrical power transmission, power loss PlossP_{\text{loss}} due to resistance in the transmission lines can be minimized by optimizing the transmission voltage. The goal is to find the optimal transmission voltage V that minimizes the power loss while meeting the system’s constraints.


Background and Formula:

  1. Power Loss Formula:
    Power loss in a transmission line is given by:

    Ploss=I2RP_{\text{loss}} = I^2 RWhere:

    • II = current through the line (in amperes).
    • RR = resistance of the transmission line (in ohms).
  2. Power Delivered to the Load:
    The power delivered to the load is:

    P=VIP = VIWhere:

    • PP = power delivered to the load (in watts).
    • VV = transmission voltage (in volts).
  3. Current in Terms of PP and VV:
    From P=VIP = VI:

    I=PVI = \frac{P}{V}

  4. Substitute II into PlossP_{\text{loss}}:
    Substituting I=PVI = \frac{P}{V} into PlossP_{\text{loss}}:

    Ploss=(PV)2RP_{\text{loss}} = \left(\frac{P}{V}\right)^2 R
    Ploss=P2RV2


Goal:

Minimize Ploss=P2RV2P_{\text{loss}} = \frac{P^2 R}{V^2} with respect to VV.


Steps to Solve:

  1. Differentiate PlossP_{\text{loss}}:

    d(Ploss)dV=2P2RV3\frac{d(P_{\text{loss}})}{dV} = \frac{-2P^2 R}{V^3}

  2. Set the Derivative to Zero:
    To find the critical points:

    2P2RV3=0\frac{-2P^2 R}{V^3} = 0
    Since PP, RR, and VV are positive, this equation does not yield a valid critical point (minimization depends on the constraints of VV).

  3. Constraint on VV:
    In practice, VV cannot be arbitrarily large due to insulation and equipment limitations. The minimum power loss occurs at the maximum allowable VV under system constraints.
  4. Practical Solution:
    Choose VV as the highest feasible transmission voltage within safety and equipment limits to minimize PlossP_{\text{loss}}. Higher VV results in lower II, reducing power loss.

Example:

Given:

  • P=100kWP = 100 \, \text{kW} (power delivered).
  • R=5ΩR = 5 \, \Omega (line resistance).
  • Allowable voltage range: 10kVV50kV10 \, \text{kV} \leq V \leq 50 \, \text{kV}.

Solution:

Substitute P=100,000WP = 100,000 \, \text{W} and R=5ΩR = 5 \, \Omega into the power loss formula:

Ploss=(100,000)25V2P_{\text{loss}} = \frac{(100,000)^2 \cdot 5}{V^2}

  • For V=10kVV = 10 \, \text{kV}:

    Ploss=(100,000)2510,0002=500WP_{\text{loss}} = \frac{(100,000)^2 \cdot 5}{10,000^2} = 500 \, \text{W}

  • For V=50kVV = 50 \, \text{kV}:

    Ploss=(100,000)2550,0002=20WP_{\text{loss}} = \frac{(100,000)^2 \cdot 5}{50,000^2} = 20 \, \text{W}

Conclusion:

By increasing the transmission voltage from 10kV10 \, \text{kV} to 50kV50 \, \text{kV}, the power loss is reduced from 500W500 \, \text{W} to 20W20 \, \text{W}. This illustrates the importance of high transmission voltage in minimizing power.

This principle is applied in designing high-voltage transmission systems for efficient energy distribution!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *